home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.crystalball.com!news
- From: Larry Weiss <lfw@oc.com>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- Subject: Re: Please Read!!
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 11:54:51 -0600
- Organization: crystalball.com
- Message-ID: <3152E96B.28DF@oc.com>
- References: <4il2kq$18i1@ns2.ryerson.ca> <danpop.827237966@rscernix>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: external2.oc.com
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; I)
-
- Dan Pop wrote:
- >
- > In <4il2kq$18i1@ns2.ryerson.ca> asaporta@jupiter.scs.Ryerson.CA (Avram Saporta)
- > writes:
- >
- > > I am doing a paper called;
- > > 'By making C++ compatible with C, Stroustrup has "created a monster"
- > >which is neither good Object Oriented Language nor a suitable replacement
- > >for C.'
- >
- > I tend to agree with this statement. OTOH, the feature that is
- > "responsible" for C++'s success over all the other OOPL available is
- > the "compatibility" with C.
- >
- > In an ideal world, we wouldn't have to accept compromises. Unfortunately,
- > our worls is far from ideal :-(
- >
-
- I've seen the new language Java described as C++ without the C.
-
- Maybe there's hope?
-